论我国违宪审查制度的模式选择
摘 要
违宪审查是特定国家机关对宪法行为是否违宪的1种裁判和处理机制, 其实质是保障公民基本权利。我国实行全国人大及其常委会违宪审查模式,但目前其存在违宪审查主体能力不足、审查对象不全、审查权责不统1和审查程序、方式存有瑕疵等问题。我国应在尊重国情、公民权利保护和机构改革效益最大化3项原则基础上，建立由宪法监督委员会和全国人大各专门委员会分工行使违宪审查权，事前审查和事后审查相结合的违宪审查模式。
关键词：违宪审查;司法审查;违宪
Abstract
Constitutional Review is a mechanism which specific state organs magistrate and handle constitution behavior whether violates the constitution, and its essence is to protect the fundamental rights of citizens. China adopted the Constitutional Review Mode of the NPC and its standing committee, but it has some issues at present, such as the ability of Constitutional Review body is poor, the review is incomplete, the review responsibilities are not unified and review procedures and methods have flaws and so on. China should respect in the respect national condition, the rights of citizens protection and in the organization reform benefit maximization three principles foundations, established the combination of prior review and after review model, which the constitution surveillance committee sharing the exercise of the Constitutional Review power with the special committees of the NPC.
Key word: Constitutional Review; Judicial review; Unconstitutional
..............................
注：【包括：毕业，任务书，开题报告】
【论我国违宪审查制度的模式选择】相关文章：
论我国银行保险发展模式的现实选择09-16
我国最高法院在违宪审查的作用[①]08-15
论我国寿险营销模式的创新09-04
论我国企业团体财务控制模式的选择09-26
审计模式的比较与选择08-10
浅论我国成功企业的基本模式07-18
略论我国金融控股公司的立法模式08-03
企业并购重组的模式选择08-06
论我国夫妻财产制度的完善07-03
试论我国逮捕制度的完善09-11